Author's Note: Right, how to explain a six months unplanned, unannounced hiatus? There really isn't that much to tell, except that, clearly, I needed a break. I'm not going to promise that I'll be posting here every week from now on, but I do have more to say, so I will promise this: If I ever feel an extended break coming on again I'll keep you updated. In the meantime, I hope some of my readers remain because I worked hard on this.
Something I noticed very soon after being introduced to Fat Acceptance, was that the fatness of women and men seem to be judged differently. This seemed unfair to me, and I wondered; why is being fat more acceptable for men than it is for women? As I attempted to answer this question, more questions that needed answers arose, and it all got very complicated for a while. Which is why I was so surprised when the answer turned out to be so simple. But I'm getting ahead of myself, first there were other questions to answer, like
Is it actually more socially acceptable to be a fat man than a fat woman?
Feministing will tell you that it is. They wrote about a study done by two researchers at New York University, which found that “heavy set” women face more job discrimination. According to this study:
- "A 1 percent increase in a woman’s body mass index — a measure of weight relative to height — pushes family income down by about 0.6 percent."
- "[...] women who are “heavy” for their height have a lesser chance of getting married and a higher chance of getting divorced."
"Aha," thought I (and perhaps you as well), "just as I thought." That was until I reached this line:
"Finally, the researcher found that body mass does not effect men in work or in marriage and divorce." I thought of a couple of the fat men I know, and suddenly I had questions again.
So did Ampersand over at
Alas! who wondered
Why Don't Studies Find Discrimination Against Fat Men? Some of the thoughts expressed grabbed my attention:
" [...] it’s simply more socially acceptable for men to be a little chubby than women. A man with a small “spare tire” – Jay Leno, say – is considered “normal” and not discriminated against; a woman who is objectively carrying around the same amount of “extra” weight around her hips or tummy is considered fat, and will be discriminated against."
 |
| Bryan Bedder / Getty Images |

Can you imagine the same amount of attention being given to Alec Baldwin's weight as Adele's?
Once again I had encountered a view that made perfect sense to me. "Fat" for men seem to start at a higher weight than for women. I notice this especially when I watch TV; the leading men, as well as the leading women, are usually quite slender, but apart from that, chubby, and even fat, men are not an unusual sight at all. Whereas chubby and fat women are quite the rare sight. But I was determined not to accept an opinion as fact just because it sounded true to my ears, and as it turned out I didn't have to. Recently a
story about a Danish study came out, confirming that:
- "Men generally underrated their own weight. Many of the men whose BMI scores suggested they were obese regarded their weight as normal."
- "[...] the women whose BMI scores showed they were underweight or normal weight had a tendency to overestimate their own weight."
- "[...] the survey showed that whereas the women tend to underestimate their men’s weight levels only slightly, the men showed a clear tendency to overestimate their women’s weight when the women were either underweight or normal weight."
So that's fun. At least I now felt I could state with some certainty that it is more socially acceptable to be a fat man than a fat woman. Yet now I wondered:
Is there some way to actually show that this is felt by the average woman?
It wasn't that hard to find an answer to this question. According to livestrong.com,
CNBC reported in February 2010 that weight loss is a $55 billion-a-year industry globally. I didn't feel I needed proof to claim that there are more women spending money on these types of products than there are men.
Weight loss isn't the only manifestation of women's need to alter our appearances, as proven by something else I came across. I found a
statistic which showed that Norwegian corporations sold $2,081,840,000 (11 795 100 000NOK) worth of perfume and cosmetics products in 2008. Comparatively they sold food, drink, tobacco and alcohol worth a combined $34,878,740,000 (197 612 500 000NOK). Clearly women are being told there is an ideal way to look (and smell), and that they don't fit the bill. - I am not going to go into who or what brings us this message, nor how this ideal was decided upon, as that would fill up another couple of blog posts. - What are these "improvements" meant to accomplish, though? Well, it's pretty obvious, isn't it? They're meant to help us attract a mate. But men want to attract suitable mates too, so
Why is being fat more acceptable for men than it is for women?
I'll tell you why;
because women are failures if they don't get married. This isn't how I personally feel mind you, and most of you (all of you?) are right now vehemently disagreeing with this statement. Still, this is the very clear message we receive from society.
Ever since the upwards revaluation of marriage in the late 1500s, continuing in the 1600s, so much of a woman's identity has been tied to marriage. We had to get married to have children, we had to get married to have sex. Access to the workforce, and later education, being limited the way it was, we needed to get married to avoid a life in poverty. Marriage became the ultimate goal. To help us along there were arranged marriages, and dowries, and serious social repercussions if one failed to find a husband. Today many of these things are changed, but erasing such a deep-rooted and integral part of a people's culture is no easy feat, and, as with the more broad struggle for equality between the sexes, this task has not been completed. As a small example, I invite you to consider the difference between our word for an unmarried woman of a certain age, "spinster", and the word for a man in the same postition, "bachelor". Which would you rather be called?
While people have probably married for love for as long as we have married, love being a necessary ingredient in a marriage is a fairly recent notion, and one that to this day isn't even close to being a worldwide idea. Attraction, however, has always been a component in these types of relationships.
As human beings, the thought has been deeply ingrained in us that being attractive will aid us in finding a suitable partner. Still there's a problem, because not everyone finds the same things attractive. Here society has long been very helpful in instructing people in what is, and what is not, attractive. And this is where we fat women fail, because, by not being slender, we are failing to conform as closely as possible to the current beauty standard. The fact that
diet's don't work doesn't matter, of course, because most people think they do. So here you have a bunch of women, walking around,
clearly (note the sarcasm) being either too stupid or too lazy to do everything they can to attract a man. This kind of behavior cannot be condoned, and so the
fat-shaming goes on.
Have you noticed the difference in attitudes towards fat men and fat women? Do you think my theory holds up? Are you perhaps a fat man, and feel I have missed something important, if so, do speak up!